On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:01:00PM +0000, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Unman:
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:14:53AM -0400, cprise wrote:
> >> On 06/05/15 21:23, Unman wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 01:12:52PM +0200, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is some great news:
> >>>> http://blog.invisiblethings.org/2015/06/04/otf-funding-announcement.html
> >>>>
> >>>> In other news: Qubes Canary #3 has been published yesterday:
> >>>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-secpack/blob/master/canaries/canary-003-2015.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> joanna.
> >>>>
> >>> Great news on the funding, congratulations.
> >>>
> >>> It isn't clear to me what features the whonix gateway provides that the
> >>> torvm/torfw combo doesn't - can someone on the whonix side help me out on
> >>> this?
> >>>
> >>> cheers
> >>>
> >>> unman
> >>>
> >>
> >> They have a detailed comparison here:
> >>
> >> /wiki/Comparison_with_Others> >>
> >> If you want to use non-browser apps over Tor then Whonix is better because
> >> they test for leaks and each app benefits from stream isolation. It also
> >> protects against fingerprinting, and sets up TorBrowser as the default
> >> browser (last I checked in TorVM, you had to use regular Firefox or go
> >> through a special TorBrowser setup process that isn't described in the
> >> wiki).
> >>
> > I've read that comparison and I've ploughed through lots of the whonix
> > documentation. What i haven't seen is a design document or specification
> > for the whonix gateway.
> >
> > On the points you mention, the torvm provides stream isolation, and the
> > setup of TBB is pretty trivial and (now) well documented. I thought that
> > it was the whonix ws which provided protection against fingerprinting -
> > is this a function performed by the gateway too?
> > As for the testing, do you mean that there's some packet inspection in
> > the gateway to guard against metadata leakage or something like that? Or
> > do you mean that whonix-qubes is tested in some way that qubes isn't? If it's
> > the latter then we can pretty easily fix that.
> >
> > There's a comment in the documentation that the whonix templates may
> > provide a more usable and robust solution for torifying traffic. As I
> > don't encounter any problems with the torvm, and haven't seen many
> > reported in the lists, I don't know what to make of this.
> >
> > What I was looking for was some detail on what the whonix gateway
> > provides that the torvm/torfw combo doesn't. The reason why I think it's
> > important is that if there are features then I think they should be
> > ported to the torvm so that users who don't want to use
> > whonix will still benefit from them.
> > Also the advantage of a simpler system, only one code base to maintain
> > etc etc. And if there were a unified tor gateway solution the devs could
> > focus on the whonix workstation template, which is, I think, where most
> > of the anonymising configuration in the apps takes place.
> >
> > Anyone help me out?
> >
> > unman
> >
>> For a list what Whonix does, go to https://github.com/Whonix and check
> the short summaries. ~7 pages with ~20 packages. From there you can
> click any package and view the long description, from there perhaps dig
> deeper. See also:
> - /wiki/Dev/Design-Detailed> - /wiki/Design>> Cheers,
> Patrick
>Thanks Patrick,
I was looking specifically at the whonix-gw: as I've said I've looked at
the documentation.
I think I will have to dig in to the code, and cant seem to do this on
github as its configured. I'll clone and review.
Cheers
u
More information about the Whonix-devel
mailing list
“Look here!” Dick began to chuckle. “We’ve got a queer combination to work with—our Sky Patrol has! Suspicious Sandy—and—Superstitious Jeff!” Sandy grinned ruefully, a little sheepishly. Larry smiled and shook his head, warning Dick not to carry his sarcasm any further, as Jeff frowned. 52 "You do doubt me. If you did not, it would never occur to you to deny it. You doubt me now, and you will doubt me still more if you don't read it. In justice to me you must." "That same. She was part Mescalero, anyway." This Act, as disgraceful as any which ever dishonoured the statute-book in the reigns of the Tudors or Stuarts, was introduced into the Commons, on the 12th of May, by Sir William Wyndham, and was resolutely opposed by the Whigs, amongst whom Sir Peter King, Sir Joseph Jekyll, Mr. Hampden, Robert Walpole, and General Stanhope distinguished themselves. They did not convince the majority, which amounted to no less than two hundred and thirty-seven to one hundred and twenty-six. In the Lords, Bolingbroke himself moved the second reading, and it was ably opposed by the Lords Cowper, Wharton, Halifax, Townshend, Nottingham, and others. The greatest curiosity was displayed regarding the part which Oxford would take, as it was known that in the Council he had endeavoured to soften the rigorous clauses; but in the House he followed his usual shuffling habit, declaring that he had not yet considered the question; and, having induced the Opposition to let the second reading pass without a division, he absented himself from the final voting, and thus disgusted both parties and hastened his own fall. The battle of Falkirk, which in itself appeared so brilliant an affair for Prince Charles, was really one of his most serious disasters. The Highlanders, according to their regular custom when loaded with plunder, went off in great numbers to their homes with their booty. His chief officers became furious against each other in discussing their respective merits in the battle. Lord George Murray, who had himself behaved most bravely in the field, complained that Lord John Drummond had not exerted himself, or pursuit might have been made and the royal army been utterly annihilated. This spirit of discontent was greatly aggravated by the siege of the castle of Stirling. Old General Blakeney, who commanded the garrison, declared he would hold out to the last man, in spite of the terrible threats of Lord George Murray if he did not surrender. The Highlanders grew disgusted with work so contrary to their habits; and, indeed, the French engineer, the so-called Marquis de Mirabelle, was so utterly ignorant of his profession, that the batteries which he constructed were commanded by the castle, and the men were so much exposed that they were in danger of being destroyed before they took the fortress. Accordingly, on the 24th of January they struck to a man, and refused to go any more into the trenches. "Haint we bit off more'n we kin chaw. Shorty?" asked Si, as he looked over the increasing gang. "Hadn't we better ask for some help?" "How far would it carry?" Corpril, Company Q, 2 Hundsrdth Injiamiy Volintear "He d?an't care much. F?ather, he likes to be comfortable, and this Inclosure w?an't make much difference to that. 'T?un't as if we wanted the pasture badly, and F?ather he d?an't care about land." "Byles," interrupted Calverley, speaking rapidly, "you are poor—you are in arrear with your rent; a distress will be levied, and then what will become of you—of your wife and the little one? Listen to me! I will give you money to keep a house over your head; and when I am steward, you shall have the first farm at my lord's disposal, if you will only aid me in my revenge! Revenge!" he repeated, vehemently—"but you hesitate—you refuse." "Yes, yes, there is little doubt of that: but how can we come at the truth? Sudbury still retains his wrath against us, and would oppose an arrest; and even could he be waylaid, and brought hither, he is stubborn, and might refuse to answer." HoME一级做人爱c视正版免费
ENTER NUMBET 0017 xihe0.net.cn www.wed99.com.cn turetea.com.cn www.wenhua8.com.cn www.sanme3.com.cn www.ibogoo.com.cn miman8.net.cn www.anlexbc.org.cn www.juwan3.net.cn www.qunhe2.net.cn